From a single company score card to a full dataset covering 2,099 listed firms — the same TBR model, the same DART-verified data, delivered in the format your workflow requires.
54% of KOSPI firms and 80.5% of KOSDAQ firms score below 60 on the Apex G-Score. Yet most receive acceptable governance ratings from global ESG providers — because those frameworks measure whether institutions exist, not whether they function.
KOSDAQ has zero Celestial-tier firms and 20.7% Poison Apples — companies that look healthy on every conventional screen but concentrate power behind high-transparency facades. In our data, Poison Apple firms post ROE of +7.5%, nearly identical to Celestials at +7.7%, while carrying the lowest debt ratio of any archetype. Yet their governance structure is fundamentally different. No global framework is calibrated to detect this.
If you are allocating capital to Korean equities without Korea-specific governance data, you are accepting unscreened exposure to these risks. The Apex G-Score was built to close this gap.
See how the G-Score works on companies you already know. Pre-built score cards for select Korean benchmark companies — TBR axis scores, overall grade, and archetype classification in a one-page format.
See sample: Samsung Electronics →Test the G-Score on your portfolio. Submit 5–10 companies and receive TBR scores, archetype classification, axis-level grades, and a brief analytical summary for each. Typical delivery: one week.
Contact for pilot →Single-company governance analysis. Full TBR breakdown with indicator-level grades, peer comparison, time-series trends, and written analytical narrative. 15–25 pages.
Request a deep dive →Full coverage. 2,099 KOSPI and KOSDAQ companies, scored annually from 2020 to 2025. TBR axis scores, overall grades, archetype classification. CSV/Parquet with full data dictionary. Annual updates included.
Contact for licensing →Full G-Score diagnostic with axis-level analysis, peer benchmarking, and actionable improvement roadmap. For listed companies seeking to strengthen governance ahead of Value-Up participation, institutional investor engagement, or internal reform.
Contact for advisory →Independent governance assessment for pre-IPO companies. Planned expansion of the G-Score framework to private companies preparing for listing. Provides third-party governance validation for investor due diligence.
Let's talk.
Whether you're exploring governance data for your portfolio or considering a diagnostic for your company.