Semiconductors · Consumer ElectronicsAdaptive Governance ArchetypeFY2024 Scoring Period
Total G-Score
78.6
B
Top 18% KOSPI
Kill Switch — Not Triggered
T — Transparency
95
Transparency
B — Balance of Power
78
Balance of Power
R — Related-party Risk
63
Related-party Risk
Weighted Total
78.6
Weighted Total
Kill Switch
Not Triggered
Score valid
TBR Risk Profile
Samsung
KOSPI avg.
Axis-Level Analysis
T — Transparency
95
Structural quality of disclosure — shareholder meeting notice timing, dividend predictability, correction frequency. Samsung ranks in the top tier across KOSPI. 4 of 5 items rated Excellent, 1 Adequate.
B — Balance of Power
78
Distribution of decision-making authority. Outside director independence, audit committee efficacy, minority shareholder protections. 3 of 6 items Excellent, 3 Adequate.
R — Related-party Risk
63
Structural conflict-of-interest risk. Related-party transaction terms, convertible instrument conditions, treasury stock disposition policy. R-03 (treasury stock) is the sole Insufficient item.
Item-Level Ratings
Transparency · T95
T-01
AGM notice timeliness
Excellent
T-02
Dividend policy predictability
Excellent
T-03
Correction filing frequency
Excellent
T-04
Disclosure consistency
Adequate
T-05
Executive compensation disclosure
Excellent
Balance of Power · B78
B-01
Outside director independence
Excellent
B-02
Audit committee effectiveness
Adequate
B-03
Board dissenting vote record
Adequate
B-04
Minority shareholder proposal rights
Excellent
B-05
Cumulative voting adoption
Excellent
B-06
Executive concurrent directorship
Adequate
Related-party Risk · R63
R-01
Related-party transaction terms
Adequate
R-03
Treasury stock disposition policy
Insufficient
R-04
Convertible instrument transparency
Excellent
R-05
Affiliate support structure
Excellent
Analyst Summary
Samsung Electronics achieves top-tier transparency (T=95), ranking among the strongest disclosers across KOSPI. Board oversight (B=78) is solid, though audit committee deliberation records and dissenting vote history are not publicly verifiable — a pattern characteristic of the Adaptive Governance archetype. The single most actionable governance gap is R-03 (treasury stock disposition policy): the absence of explicit board-level criteria for disposition and beneficiary scope is the primary factor holding the R axis at Grade C. Kill Switch not triggered. Overall: a well-governed large-cap with targeted structural gaps addressable through disclosure policy changes.